Re-rebuttal on Nintendo

However, graphics can be limiting factors. Less than mediocre graphics in today's and past standards can:

• inhibit level / maps clarity or objective
• cause an unintuitive UI
  
• reduce gameplay possibilities i.e., a massive world without causing the above point
• reduce gameplay's effectiveness (see: horror games)
• be a sore to look
  

However, if at the time of release of the game the graphics do not fall into the above pitfalls, then I can look past them.



I would still like it to look good though.

Rebuttal to Mos on Nintendo

I agree with Mos, if he was not such a gibbering cock-twat. You place too much in graphics. Doesn't gameplay matter more then graphics, dong fondler? After all these years, games like Starcraft and Homeworld are still epic.


...rectal conquistador.

Wii 2 and DS 2

Alright Nintendo, you tout gameplay over the"good-enough"graphics of your current systems. Off the heels of the past generation the games look merely acceptable now, but in a few years they will look horrible; some games already do. Your new console would have to be pretty innovative to trump motion controls in order to allow you to release the console with updated hardware.

test

test